Champerty & maintenance

Wilson v. Harris

Alabama Court of Civil Appeals · US (AL) · 1996 · Decided

Citation/Docket: 688 So. 2d 265 (Ala. Civ. App. 1996)

Parties & Funders

Posture: Enforceability of funding agreement
Funder(s) involved: (Individual funder)

Background

Funding agreement for a share of lawsuit proceeds challenged under Alabama public policy.

Holding & Outcome

Void, a 'gambling contract' akin to champerty.

Practical Lesson

Alabama remains one of the most hostile jurisdictions; some contracts are unsalvageable by drafting.

Matters like this one often turn on expert testimony, on valuation, industry custom and practice, legal ethics, or damages. The Institute partners with world-class expert witness referral companies for this purpose.

Compiled from public sources (court filings, published opinions, and secondary reporting) as part of the Institute's Phase 1 Dispute Library research. This is educational material, not legal advice; case citations should be independently verified before relied upon.

← Back to the Dispute Library