Champerty & maintenance

Saladini v. Righellis

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · US (MA) · 1997 · Decided

Citation/Docket: 687 N.E.2d 1224 (Mass. 1997)

Parties & Funders

Posture: Funder sought recovery from funded claimant
Funder(s) involved: (Individual funder)

Background

An individual advanced funds for a lawsuit in exchange for a share of recovery; enforceability turned on champerty.

Holding & Outcome

SJC abandoned champerty in Massachusetts, reviewing such agreements instead for overall fairness.

Practical Lesson

The 'fairness review' framework Saladini adopted is the model many courts now apply in champerty's place.

Matters like this one often turn on expert testimony, on valuation, industry custom and practice, legal ethics, or damages. The Institute partners with world-class expert witness referral companies for this purpose.

Compiled from public sources (court filings, published opinions, and secondary reporting) as part of the Institute's Phase 1 Dispute Library research. This is educational material, not legal advice; case citations should be independently verified before relied upon.

← Back to the Dispute Library