Disclosure obligations

In re National Prescription Opiate Litigation

U.S. District Court, N.D. Ohio (MDL 2804) · US (OH) · 2018 · Order entered

Citation/Docket: 2018 WL 2127807 (N.D. Ohio May 7, 2018)

Parties & Funders

Posture: Sua sponte MDL case-management order
Funder(s) involved: (Various MDL plaintiffs' funders)

Background

Judge Polster ordered plaintiffs' counsel to disclose third-party funding in camera and certify the funder had no control over strategy or settlement.

Holding & Outcome

First major MDL-wide funding disclosure order; in camera model followed elsewhere.

Practical Lesson

The in-camera + no-control certification model is the template many courts now use; funders should draft agreements able to survive that certification.

Matters like this one often turn on expert testimony, on valuation, industry custom and practice, legal ethics, or damages. The Institute partners with world-class expert witness referral companies for this purpose.

Compiled from public sources (court filings, published opinions, and secondary reporting) as part of the Institute's Phase 1 Dispute Library research. This is educational material, not legal advice; case citations should be independently verified before relied upon.

← Back to the Dispute Library